study military strategy

Study Military Strategy - What is military strategy today? In an era when European states are trying to de-escalate and avoid armed conflict, and where politicians fear the consequences of prolonged operations or tactical threats, does military strategy matter?

This is the first volume to examine NATO's current military risks and threats from a military strategy perspective. What strategies are needed? Is it possible today to think of means-goal-means as a strategic model? Contributors explore the relative importance, utility, and options of NATO-wide military strategy as it faces a variety of old and new challenges, such as hybrid threats, new nuclear risks, and conventional force fusion. They also explore what military strategy and military integration actually mean when NATO's multilateral framework is weakened by a degree of self-interest. They analyze the US political and military role in Europe and evaluate strategic military responses to Russian aggression in Ukraine and the Middle East. In addition, they study the role of member states' military strategy against Article 5 and other Article 5 risks and threats, and examine how European states develop and implement military strategic options.

Study Military Strategy

"A sober and stimulating set of essays that remind us of the importance of military strategy and the difficulty of politicians thinking strategically. The authors take aim at some dangerous misconceptions that, if left unchecked, continue to weaken the Western alliance." - Christopher Cocker, Department of International Affairs, London School of Economics and author

The Levels Of War As Levels Of Analysis

"Two world experts pick the winning team in the ongoing Olympics of strategy. By exploring the complexity of strategy and its cultural variations, this book provides a valuable update on individual states' positions. It should be on every IR reading list!" - Beatrice Heuser, Professor of International Relations, University of Glasgow

"This excellent new book provides much-needed in-depth analysis of the concept of military strategy, the utility of military force, and the different approaches of NATO member states to the wide range of challenges facing the Alliance in the 21st century."

Janne Haaland Matlary is Professor of International Politics at the University of Oslo and the Norwegian Military Command and Staff College; He was the first deputy foreign minister of Norway.

Robert Johnson is director of the Center for the Changing Nature of War at the University of Oxford. He is the author of many publications, including Derived from the Greek word strategos, the term strategy appeared in the 18th century.

Buy The Strategy Of The Great War: A Study Of Its Campaigns And Battles In Their Relation To Allied And German Military Policy Book Online At Low Prices In India

Military strategy deals with the planning and conduct of campaigns, the movement and deployment of forces, and the deception of the enemy.

The father of modern Western strategic studies, Carl von Clausewitz (1780-1831), defined military strategy as "the use of battles to win a war."

B.H. Liddell Hart's definition placed less emphasis on warfare, defining strategy as "the art of deploying and using military means to achieve policy objectives."

Sun Tzu (544-496 BC) is often considered the father of Eastern military strategy and greatly influenced the historical and modern warfare tactics of China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam.

Saass Strategic Thinkers Program

Sun Tzu's Art of War has grown in popularity as well as practical application in Western society. It continues to influence many competing tasks in Asia, Europe, and the Americas, including culture, politics,

Like modern warfare. Eastern military strategy differs from Western military strategy in that it focuses on asymmetric warfare and deception.

Strategy differs from operations and tactics because strategy involves using all of a nation's military capabilities through high-level, long-term planning, development, and acquisition to ensure security or victory. Operations and tactics are the art of organizing forces on or near the battlefield to secure objectives as part of a broader military strategy.

Military strategy is the planning and execution of a contest between groups of armed adversaries. Strategy, which is a sub-discipline of war and foreign policy, is the main tool for protecting national interests. It is larger in perspective than military tactics, which involve the deployment and maneuvering of units on a particular sea or battlefield.

Indian Army's Orthodox Doctrine Distorts Military Strategy In Ladakh Type Conflicts: Study

But less broad than grand strategy is otherwise known as national strategy, which is the overarching strategy of a larger organization, such as a nation-state, confederation, or international alliance, and involves the use of diplomatic, informational, military, and economic resources. Military strategy involves the use of military resources such as people, equipment, and information to gain superiority over an adversary's resources or to reduce an adversary's readiness to fight, developed under the guidance of a scientific military.

The definition of NATO strategy is “how military power is to be developed and used to achieve national objectives or to achieve the objectives of a group of nations.

Strategy can be divided into "grand strategy", geopolitical objectives, and "military strategy", which translates geopolitical policy objectives into militarily achievable objectives and campaigns. Field Marshal Viscount Allanbrook, Chief of the Imperial General Staff and Co-Chairman of the Anglo-US Joint Chiefs of Staff for most of World War II, described the art of military strategy as: On attainable military objectives: the evaluation of these objectives in terms of the military requirements and preconditions they create, which may Need to achieve each: measuring existing and potential resources against requirements and the objectives derived from them. About priorities and rational course of action".

Field Marshal Montgomery summed it up this way: “Strategy is the art of allocating and using military resources, such as armed forces and supplies, to accomplish policy objectives. Tactics means the provisions and control of military and technical forces. relevance. fight To put it more briefly: strategy is the art of conducting war, tactics is the art of fighting."

Quiz & Worksheet

Military strategy was still seen in the 19th century as one of the trivium of "arts" or "sciences" governing the conduct of war; The rest is tactics, the execution of plans and the maneuvering of forces in battle, and logistics, the maintenance of troops. The view prevailed since Roman times, and the line between strategy and tactics was blurred at this time, and sometimes the categorization of a decision is almost a matter of personal opinion. Carnot, during the French Revolutionary Wars, thought it meant only shrinking the troops.

Strategy and tactics are closely related and exist on the same continuum; Modern thinking places the operational level between them. They all involve distance, time, and power, but strategy is large-scale, can span years, and is social, while tactics are small-scale and involve deploying fewer elements over hours to weeks. Originally, strategy aimed to manage the prelude to battle, while tactics controlled its execution. However, in the world wars of the twentieth century, the distinction between maneuver and battle, strategy and tactics, evolved with technology and transit capability. Tactics that had once been the province of the cavalry company were applied to the Panzer Army.

It is often said that the art of strategy determines the goals to be achieved in a military campaign, while tactics determines the methods for achieving those goals. Strategic objectives may be "we want to conquer territory X", or "we want to stop the expansion of country Y in world trade in commodity Z"; Whereas tactical decisions differ from a general statement, such as "we will do this for a naval invasion north of country X", "we will block the ports of country Y", to the more specific "C platoon will attack. D platoon will provide covering fire".

In its purest form, the strategy concerned only military matters. In early societies, the king or political leader was often the same person as the military leader. Otherwise, the communication distance between the political and military leadership was small. But as the need for a professional army grew, the boundaries between politicians and the military were recognized. In many cases it was decided that separation was necessary.

Ashton Carter Approves Final Strategy For Women In Military Combat Roles

As the French statesman Georges Clemsault said, "War is too important a business to be left to soldiers." This gave rise to the concept of grand strategy

Which includes the management of the pneumatic nation's resources in the conduct of war. In the context of grand strategy, military composition is largely reduced to operational strategy—the planning and control of large military units such as corps and divisions. As armies grew in size and number, and the technology to communicate and control them improved, the distinction between "military strategy" and "grand strategy" narrowed. Fundamental to grand strategy is diplomacy, through which a nation can form alliances or pressure another nation into compliance, thereby achieving victory without fighting. Another element of grand strategy is post-war peace management.

As Clausewitz stated, a successful military strategy may be a means to an end, but it is not an end in itself.

There are many examples in history where victory on the battlefield does not translate into goals such as long-term peace, security or tranquility.

List Of Military Tactics Wikipedia

Examples and perspective in this section are mainly about